Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mikelis Libietis vs Ti Chen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Libietis vs Chen analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Mikelis Libietis vs Ti Chen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Libietis 1 - 0 Chen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Libietis has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Libietis, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Libietis has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Libietis has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Libietis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 47/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Chen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 621/ 380), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Libietis winning 1 times and Chen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Libietis winning 2 and Chen winning 0. The last match between Libietis and Chen was at the Thailand F9, 30-11-2015, Second, Hard with Mikelis Libietis getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Libietis and Chen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Libietis winning 0 times and Chen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Libietis winning 0, and Chen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Libietis has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Libietis has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Libietis has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
714
Rank
352
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
184
High
40
Age
R
Plays
Form
56% (83-64)
Career Total W/L
60% (683-461)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$57,495
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mikelis Libietis vs Ti Chen For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Libietis VS Chen
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Mikelis Libietis | Ti Chen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (27/50) | 61% (44/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (22/27) | 48% (21/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 30% (7/23) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (6/20) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (39/72) | 42% (21/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Mikelis Libietis
Player
Ti Chen
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mikelis Libietis | Ti Chen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mikelis Libietis Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Mikelis Libietis
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Mikelis Libietis
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Julian Zlobinsky
Player
Mikelis Libietis
47%
(
41 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre Faivre
Player
Mikelis Libietis
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikelis Libietis
Player
Fabian Gruber
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
22%
(
2 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Mikelis Libietis
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Ti Chen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Ti Chen
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rishi Reddy
Player
Ti Chen
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Ti Chen
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Geun Jun Kim
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 7-5 10-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tsung-Hua Yang
Player
Ti Chen
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
64
|
6-7(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Luca Castelnuovo
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Ti Chen
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Han-Chih Lin
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Libietis Vs Chen Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Libietis are available here and Chen photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
